Home / 비교
Character.AI vs Replika
Character.AI edges Replika on our editorial score (4.4 vs 4.1), but Character.AI is the stronger pick if you want image sharing, while Replika fits better if video matter more.
| Character.AI | Replika | |
|---|---|---|
| 편집 점수 | 4.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| 가격 | $7.92/mo | $5.83/mo |
| 가격대 | Under $10/mo | Under $10/mo |
| 무료 플랜 | 예 | 예 |
| 가격 상세 | c.ai+ $9.99/mo or $94.99/yr (~$7.92/mo). Free chat is unlimited but carries ads, a daily swipe cap and a Charms currency. A cheaper (c.ai) lite tier exists but its price varies by region. | Pro $19.99/mo or $69.99/yr (~$5.83/mo); Ultra $29.99/mo; a higher tier exists at an unpublished price. Replika does not list prices on its website — they show only in-app and vary by region. |
| 성인 콘텐츠 | No adult mode | No adult mode |
| 음성 | 라이브 통화 | 라이브 통화 |
| 이미지 | 예 | 아니오 |
| 동영상 | 아니오 | 예 |
| 기억 | 예 | 예 |
| 커스텀 캐릭터 | 예 | 예 |
| 컴패니언 유형 | Any character | Female companion, Male companion, Non-binary |
| 플랫폼 | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| 로컬 실행 | 아니오 | 아니오 |
Character.AI — 우리의 견해
The default starting point: unmatched variety and the most generous free tier in the category.
- 20M+ community characters
- Unlimited free text chat
- Best-in-class prose quality
Replika — 우리의 견해
Still the strongest product for people who want one companion and a real feeling of continuity.
- Deepest emotional-continuity design
- Voice calls plus AR and avatar video
- Wellbeing features are genuinely useful
Character.AI vs Replika — 자주 묻는 질문
Which is cheaper, Character.AI or Replika?
Replika is the cheaper of the two at $5.83/mo, against $7.92/mo for Character.AI.
Which one has a free tier?
Both do — you can try either without paying.
Which remembers conversations better?
Both keep context across sessions. The practical difference is elsewhere: voice support differs between them.
Which handles adult content differently?
Character.AI: No adult mode. Replika: No adult mode. This directory is SFW — we record whether a mature mode exists so you know before signing up, and we describe no explicit material.